Media
Publishers and media brands whose own pages are already what models like to cite, or compete with.
Media GEO is citability and distribution. Siege and Foundation live on those surfaces.
What to look for
| Buying criteria | Show, talent, and story entities; SEO that does not fight the CMS and ad stack. |
|---|---|
| Proof that matters | Named publishers or studios; article or show pages with durable metadata, or off-domain distribution samples. |
| Common mismatch | A performance SEO vendor that will thin out journalism to chase snippets. |
| Typical engagement | Always-on newsroom SEO plus franchise/show hubs. Breaking news is a separate workflow. |
Agencies
Siege Media for packages designed to be cited. Foundation when the GEO gap is off-domain (YouTube, Reddit, earned) rather than the CMS. iPullRank when crawl and templates on a large publisher domain are the constraint.
Absence from this table is not a warning to avoid a firm. Other agencies in the directory may still be a fit; they are reviewed on their own pages.
| Agency | Best for | Why this fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Siege Media | Packages designed to be cited | Content experiences designed to be cited, native to how media brands already think about packages. | Content studio. Citability engineering. |
| Foundation | Off-domain distribution beyond the CMS | Off-domain distribution (YouTube, Reddit, earned) when the media brand’s GEO gap is everywhere except its own CMS. | Distribution-led GEO. Partner-stack tooling. |
| iPullRank | Publishers whose CMS and retrieval are the constraint | iPullRank’s technical notes fit crawl, metadata, and template work on large publisher domains. | Enterprise technical. Use when the newsroom can write but the site cannot be fetched cleanly. |
| Agency | Lead gen | Technical | Thought leadership |
|---|---|---|---|
| Siege Media | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| Foundation | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| iPullRank | 4 | 10 | 6 |