
Pranjal Aggarwal
PhD student; lead author, GEO paper
Carnegie Mellon University
Pranjal Aggarwal is a PhD student in language technologies at Carnegie Mellon University and the lead author of GEO: Generative Engine Optimization, the November 2023 preprint accepted to KDD 2024 that named the field and introduced GEO-bench. Commercial teams still cite that paper when they need a measured academic starting point for visibility inside generative answers.
From IIT Delhi to Carnegie Mellon
Aggarwal completed undergraduate work at IIT Delhi, then spent research time at Princeton with Karthik Narasimhan before beginning a PhD in language technologies at Carnegie Mellon with Sean Welleck. His personal site frames the through-line as language models that act in the world: optimizing how they generate, how they use tools, and how content creators show up when those models answer questions.
With the GEO project, Aggarwal and coauthors asked whether content creators could measure and improve their visibility inside generative engines the way SEOs once measured rankings.
Publishing the GEO Paper
In November 2023 the team posted GEO: Generative Engine Optimization on arXiv. KDD 2024 later accepted the work. The paper treated visibility inside generative answers as a black-box optimization problem, defined metrics for how often and how prominently a source appears in generated responses, and showed that targeted content edits could raise visibility in their experimental setting.
Aggarwal is listed as lead author. Equal-contribution notes place Princeton PhD collaborators such as Vishvak Murahari and Ameet Deshpande beside him on measurement and benchmark design, with Narasimhan as senior academic and independent coauthors including Tanmay Rajpurohit and Ashwin Kalyan on the line.
GEO-bench and Content Edits
The paper introduced GEO-bench, a public query set used to measure how content changes show up inside generative answers. In the study's setting, edits such as adding statistics, quotations, and citations could raise a source's visibility by large relative margins, with reported lifts up to about 40 percent depending on the method and domain.
Later commercial tools and practitioner studies often position themselves relative to GEO-bench even when they use different engines or prompts.