Top GEO Researchers • 2026
Top GEO Researchers
Twenty paper and lab researchers shaping how generative engine optimization is measured, tested, and defended
By TGA EditorsSeptember 28, 202618 min read
Updated September 28, 2026
Generative engine optimization began as a research problem before it became an agency service line. The people on this list publish papers, benchmarks, and lab methods that show how content changes show up inside AI answers, how engines choose sources, and where optimization tips into manipulation.
We ranked twenty researchers on a Research Impact Score from 0 to 100. GEO centrality counts for 30 points: whether the work is about visibility inside generative or answer engines rather than adjacent AI topics. Novelty counts for 25. Recency counts for 20. Practitioner usability counts for 15: whether working teams can cite or run the method. Trajectory counts for 10.
Hard gates applied before scoring: a real photograph, GEO-visible public work, a verifiable identity, and a People profile on this site. This list is the paper and lab track. Faculty whose main contribution is classroom curriculum are ranked separately on the teaching and curriculum list.
Founding paper
Authors of the KDD GEO paper and GEO-bench line.
Comparative study
Large audits comparing AI search with classic web results.
Systems lab
Frameworks that learn engine preferences and rewrite at scale.
Risk study
Work that draws the line between optimization and manipulation.
Benchmark
Datasets and metrics for visibility under stochastic retrieval.
Applied lab
Industry research seats publishing usable GEO measurement.
The list
Twenty researchers ranked overall from 1 to 20. Use the bar above to jump to the first person in each role band.
Lead author, GEO: Generative Engine Optimization
Aggarwal led the November 2023 preprint that named generative engine optimization and treated visibility inside generative answers as a black-box problem researchers could measure. KDD 2024 later accepted the work.
GEO-bench and the paper's measured lifts still give commercial teams a shared academic starting point when they need more than screenshots.
Profile: Pranjal Aggarwal on People
Computer scientist, Princeton University
Narasimhan is the senior academic on the original GEO paper and a Princeton computer scientist whose earlier work includes OpenAI's first GPT paper and agent systems such as ReAct and Tree of Thoughts.
The systems marketers try to influence descend partly from research he helped create, which is why his name sits at both the naming of GEO and the stack upstream of agentic search.
Profile: Karthik Narasimhan on People
Professor of Computer Science, University of Toronto
With Mahe Chen, Xiaoxuan Wang, and Kaiwen Chen, Koudas compared AI search with Google across verticals, languages, and phrasings. The study found AI engines lean heavily on earned media and favor large brands.
Practitioners cite the work when they need academic evidence that third-party corroboration belongs at the center of a GEO program.
Profile: Nick Koudas on People
Associate Professor, Language Technologies Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Xiong's CMU group released AutoGEO, an ICLR 2026 framework that learns generative-engine preference rules and rewrites web content for more traction while tracking generative-engine utility.
AutoGEO moves the field from hand-crafted rewrite heuristics toward rule extraction, plug-and-play API rewriting, and a compact reinforcement-learning model that commercial teams can cite as a systems baseline.
Profile: Chenyan Xiong on People
Faculty, Harvard University
With Aounon Kumar, Lakkaraju showed that a crafted strategic text sequence on a product page could push a language model to name that product its top recommendation, and tied the risk to fair market competition.
The study remains the clearest academic line between legitimate visibility work and manipulation that the commercial GEO field still argues over.
Profile: Himabindu Lakkaraju on People
Assistant Professor, Columbia Business School
Peng co-authored E-GEO, the e-commerce generative engine optimization testbed that pairs thousands of intent-rich shopping queries with Amazon listings and measures rank change after rewriting.
The work gives sellers and researchers a commercial ranking objective instead of only impression proxies from earlier web GEO papers.
Profile: Tianyi Peng on People
Professor, MIT Sloan School of Management
Farias is a senior author on E-GEO and a long-running MIT Sloan researcher on decision systems, experimentation, and large-scale ranking problems.
E-GEO's prompt meta-optimization and red-team defenses sit in the same lineage as his earlier work on making optimization claims measurable under real commercial constraints.
Profile: Vivek Farias on People
PhD researcher, Princeton University
Murahari co-authored the KDD 2024 GEO paper and GEO-bench while doing Princeton PhD work on NLP systems that find and use information under real retrieval conditions.
Equal-contribution notes on the preprint place him beside Aggarwal on the measurement and benchmark design commercial teams still cite.
Profile: Vishvak Murahari on People
PhD researcher, Princeton University
Deshpande co-authored GEO and GEO-bench while completing an NLP PhD at Princeton with Narasimhan, with wider work spanning AI safety, efficient architectures, and multilingual models.
He treats visibility inside generative engines as a measurable systems problem rather than a marketing slogan.
Profile: Ameet Deshpande on People
Postdoctoral researcher, Harvard University
Kumar led Manipulating Large Language Models to Increase Product Visibility with Lakkaraju, releasing code that shows how strategic text sequences can steer product recommendations.
Coverage in major news outlets made the paper a reference for platforms and agencies that need a concrete example of recommendation-steering risk.
Profile: Aounon Kumar on People
Corresponding author, FeatGEO; Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
Xu is corresponding author on FeatGEO, the ACL 2026 paper that reframes generative citation optimization as feature-level multi-objective control over structure, content, and language.
The work argues that token-level rewrite tricks miss levers that matter when the goal is citation inside generative answers.
Profile: Peilan Xu on People
Researcher, Northeastern University
Sharma co-authored Beyond the Blue Link, the Hypertext 2026 paper that formalizes answer engine optimization and introduces Generative Share of Voice for stochastic retrieval.
His contribution sits at the seam of hypertext structure and machine-mediated attribution, which is why the paper travels beyond marketing blogs.
Profile: Raghav Sharma on People
Researcher, New York University
Kotwal co-authored Beyond the Blue Link and helped validate how authored structure relates to citation outcomes across domains under stochastic retrieval.
Generative Share of Voice gives AEO and GEO teams a probabilistic vocabulary when answers change across runs.
Profile: Adit Kotwal on People
Independent researcher, Seattle
Rajpurohit is an independent co-author of the founding GEO paper, listed beside Princeton and other lab contributors on the KDD author line.
His seat shows that the field's naming paper was not only a single-campus product, which still matters when agencies cite the full author list.
Profile: Tanmay Rajpurohit on People
Independent researcher, Seattle
Kalyan co-authored GEO and helped shape the evaluation design behind GEO-bench, including how visibility gains were compared across domains.
Public summaries of the work credit him with keeping measurement next to the optimization claim rather than treating either alone.
Profile: Ashwin Kalyan on People
Research Director, Clickstream Solutions
Van Buskirk co-led, with Kevin Indig, an independent UX study of Google's AI Overviews that used think-aloud recordings to show how people read AI answers.
The method filled a gap click logs cannot: confusion, trust moments, and scanning patterns that marketers need when they brief AI Overview projects.
Profile: Eric Van Buskirk on People
Chief AI Officer, Graphite
Druck leads scientists and engineers building AI tools for organic growth at Graphite after a PhD at UMass Amherst with Andrew McCallum and research seats at Yahoo and Yummly.
His applied lab work turns academic NLP habits into measurement systems agencies use when generative visibility has to survive client reporting.
Profile: Gregory Druck, PhD on People
Leads AI strategy, Profound
Blyskal leads AI strategy at Profound and publishes large-scale prompt and citation studies that practitioners use to see how engines choose sources.
His measurement work sits between academic GEO-bench habits and the commercial dashboards buyers hire, which is why conference audiences treat the datasets as research infrastructure.
Profile: Josh Blyskal on People
Founder, DEJAN
Petrovic publishes technical research on how generative search systems retrieve, attribute, and surface sources, including architecture write-ups that agencies use when they need more than a vendor pitch.
DEJAN's public methods treat AI-search visibility as an information-retrieval problem with measurable parts.
Profile: Dan Petrovic on People
Cofounder and CEO, WordLift
Volpini's WordLift work treats entities and knowledge graphs as the substrate generative engines use when they decide whom to cite.
Applied research demos and conference sessions on AI Mode and entity-aware content give practitioners a lab-adjacent playbook for corroboration and structured identity.
Profile: Andrea Volpini on People
Where this list goes next
Later editions will add researchers who publish new benchmarks, agentic GEO systems, and risk studies as generative engines keep changing how sources get chosen. The same gates stay: a real photo, GEO-visible work, and a People page.
Affiliations are as of September 2026.